AmNote on Jewish Infiltration of America By virtue of their small numbers (2.2 % of Americans), Jews have an undue influence on American politics, and long with it the ability to impose their will on America. For example, why is there a Holocaust Museum on the Mall in Washington, DC, but no comparable memorial for American slavery? There is no intimate connection between the "Holocaust" and America, like there is between the dark past of American slavery. Yet, there is a memorial to European Jews, but not one to the American Blacks that endured slavery and died to helped build America. And, why has it taken over fifty-five years for a World War II veterans memorial to be built on the Mall in Washington, DC, when the Holocaust Museum has been standing there for years? What is the Holocaust Museum doing on the Mall in Washington, DC, anyhow? Can anyone argue that the Holocaust Museum represents a true symbol of America and American history, like the Washington or Lincoln Memorials, and deserves to be there? Does anyone see something wrong going on here!         Soon after a foreign army invades a country, the invading forces begin to transplant their symbols on the defeated nation's soil, in places that represent the heart and soul of the nation. The Holocaust Museum represents an invasion of America by the Jews. The Holocaust Museum is an insult to the men and women who fought, sacrificed, and died for America! Why should "Holocaust" Jews be memorialized in Washington, DC at all, and worst, years before the true heroes of WW II are honored—especially since there wouldn't have been a World War II in the first place, if it weren't for the Jews.         Germany had other economic and social problems during the pre-WW II period due to World War I sanctions, but it was the larceny of the Jew working counter to the best interest of the German nation that gave the Nazis the emotional edge to gain power in Germany. The self-serving Jew in an already unstable social and political environment created an explosive combination. The German people saw the Nazis as their salvation from the thievery of the Jew, whose avaricious and criminal activities were ripping Germany apart at a time when national cohesion was critical. The Savings & Loan Bailout and the Dot Com Scams, and the Marc Rich and New Square Jew pardons serve as American examples of the financial and political corruption the Jews were involved in during the pre-WW II period in Germany. However, America seems will and able to absorb the social and financial abuse, whereas the Germans were unwilling and unable to do so. It wasn't persecution the Jews were afraid of in Germany, it was prosecution. Not only did the Jews bring the Nazis down on themselves by their sociopathic antics, but everyone else in the process. Anyone that has experienced the wickedness of a Jew understands why the German people embraced the Nazis over the Jews. Nazi Germany is an example of when Jew lies run out. Another word for "Holocaust" is "payback". There is no such thing as anti-Semitism; there is only retaliation for the evil that Jews do! It is amazing that Jews believe that the hatred directed at them is unjustified, since it is the Jews' own criminal and anti-social behavior that are the source of the animosity, but, like always, Jews never accept responsibility for their wrongdoing. Jews believe that Jews have the God given right to do whatever they please without retribution!         During World War II Americans weren't even aware that the "Holocaust" was happening, if in fact it did. The concept of the "Holocaust" didn't appear until the mid-70s, and so there isn't even a connection for Americans through our wartime memories. Did the "Holocaust" really happen? In the Jews' zeal to "prove" their "Holocaust" case, the simplest explanation for the death of Jews in concentration camps is overlooked, but the obvious answer appear when Occam's razor is applied to the "Holocaust". The "Holocaust" supposedly happened in the latter part of World War II, which is when Germany was losing the war to the Allied forces. In order to turn the tide, the Nazis sent all their resource to their frontline troops so they might defeat the invading Allied forces, and absolutely nothing to the concentration camp, including food and medicines. What the Jews suffered were the lack of proper nutrient and medical care that resulted because the Allied forces were winning the war. Starving to death and dying of diseases may have seemed like genocide, but it was the horrors and reality of war. The proof of this explanation are the photographs of sick and emaciated concentration camp prisoners taken when they were liberated. By turning gas delousing chambers into "gas chambers", the urban legend of an Auschwitz death camp was born in the imagination of the Jews. Population studies and models have shown that it is impossible for six million Jews to have died in concentation camps during WW II with the number of death being closer to 300,000.         Why is there an American "Holocaust" obsession? Because the Jews have force-fed self-serving and distorted images to Americans via television and movies, misleading them into believe that there is some connection between America and the "Holocaust", when in fact there is none. In California, "Holocaust" studies are a required part of the school curriculum, but evidence contrary to the historical accuracy of the "Holocaust" is not presented. Impressionable American school children are the targets of a diabolical social engineering program being conduct by Jews to undermine American values and further their Judaic agendas in the United States! Spielberg has an ongoing program with Universal Pictures to show "Schindler's List" for free to all U.S. high school students. Spielberg's agenda is to indoctrinate American high school students into believing the "Holocaust" is true by passing off the Hollywood manufactured lies of "Schindler's List" as history. What we have is an invasion of American conscientious that is nothing less than cultural warfare in which America is being assimilated by a foriegn invader with goals and objective contrary to the American way of life—unless being sneak thieves and liars qualifies as such. Cultural assimilation and political bribery are a traditional strategy of the Jew. The appearance of the Holocaust Museum on the Washington Mall demonstrates the role of Jews as behind-the-scenes manipulators, who traditionally advance their agenda outside of the public spotlight. The Holocaust Museum is part of the Jewish deception, and should be removed from Washington, DC, a hallowed place of American history that must not be rewritten by the Jews!         President Ronald Reagan, like some sleazy, real estate agent, literal sold America's most hallowed ground to the Jews for his own profit when he allowed the Holocaust Museum to be built on the Washington Mall—and "Nicaraguan Alzheimer's" can't explain away Reagan's selling out of America in order to put dirty, Jew money into his pocket. But, Democrats are no better than the Republicans. The Democrats and Republicans are different sides of the same Judas coin when it comes to accepting Jew money to conduct their political campaigns, and then granting special favors to their Jewish contributors as a result. U.S. Congressmen and Senators grant Israel military and foreign aid, and then in return, Israel uses the military and foreign aid money to bribe the very same Congressmen and Senators so they keep on granting the military and foreign aid to Israel. What a sweet deal for everybody, except the American taxpayer! What is needed in America is a strong, grassroots third party that won't sell out to the Jews, but instead stop the Jewish threat by ending their corruption that runs rabid in America's social, financial, and political institutions!   Ground Broken For War Memorial In D.C. —The Toronto Star With thousands of aging veterans looking on, U.S. President Bill Clinton yesterday broke ground for a World War II memorial on the National Mall, declaring that the proposed monument of graceful arches and stone tablets would be a "timeless tribute" to their bravery and sacrifice in "the greatest struggle humanity has ever known." Thirteen years in the making, the monument is planned for a 3-hectare swath of land between the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial. It will be dominated by a sculpture called "the Light of Freedom," a symbol of the battle of freedom by the United States and its allies over the the war's totalitarian foes. "The wisdom this monument will give us is to learn from the past and look to the future," Clinton told the crowd during the Veterans' Day groundbreaking. "May the light of freedom that will stand at the centre of this memorial inspire every person who sees it to keep the flame of freedom forever burning in the eyes of our children and to keep the memory of the greatest generation warm in the hearts of every new generation of Americans." Officials said that they aim to dedicate the completed memorial on Memorial Day, 2003. [click here to continue]   Tears and Broken Ground —The Washington Post Except for the urns, it had the ingredients of any Washington ground breaking: a packed dais, a huge white tent, military band and restless audience. But the crowd of 500 soon fell silent yesterday morning. As the music of the haunting Jewish prayer "Ani Ma'amin" ("I Believe") began, holocaust survivors opened six small containers and poured gray-brown silt, ashes and earth from Nazi death camps and their victims onto the American soil that will hold the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. As the fine dust and clots of dirt fell, many in the audience -- e'migre's and survivors, Jews and gentiles -- began to weep. Under the serene autumn sky, the tented gathering on 14th Street took on the feel of both a wake and a celebration. Eyes closed with the weight of gratitude and grief. "Come and see," Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel urged in his speech. "Come and learn what human beings can do to other human beings. Learn the limits of humanity. Learn, and hope is possible. Forget, and despair is inevitable." The museum is to be built with private money on federal land one block from the Mall. When it is finished in 1988, it will be the only national Holocaust memorial outside Israel, and a message to the gathering from President Reagan yesterday alluded to controversy over its location, design and conception that began soon after the memorial was first proposed in the late '70s. "Although some have questioned the wisdom of placing the memorial for a European catastrophe so close to the gleaming symbols of our democracy, the lessons of the Holocaust . . . do belong here," the Reagan message said. [click here to continue]   Beyond Isreal, Conflict About Remembrance —Los Angeles Times Controversies about Holocaust remembrance are alive abroad as well as in Israel. Most involve Jewish sensitivities that the Holocaust might be forgotten or de-emphasized. In Washington, the construction of a Holocaust museum on the Mall, among some of most revered American public icons, has sparked debate. Why is the suffering of one group at the hands of the Nazis receiving special attention when there are plenty of other groups that have suffered -- even at American hands, critics ask? [click here to continue]   Reagan Rips Anti-Semitism In Talk At Site Of Planned Holocaust Museum —The San Diego Union-Tribune President Reagan issued a challenge to anti-Semitism at home and abroad yesterday as he dedicated the cornerstone of a Holocaust museum in the face of protesters who called the memorial un-American and anti-Christian. Speaking at a ceremony near the Washington Monument, Reagan said the Holocaust Memorial Museum, scheduled for completion in 1992, "will examine the nature and meaning of the continuing curse that is anti-Semitism, the disgusting task of minimizing or even denying the truth of the Holocaust," he said. "This act of intellectual genocide must not go unchallenged." Reagan referred to groups that dispute the generally accepted account of the murder of about 6 million Jews and other persecuted people in Nazi death camps during World War II. [click here to continue]   Questioning America's Holocaust Obsession —The Plain Dealer It is a good thing, if sometimes painful, to question received wisdom, and Peter Novick does that in spades in "The Holocaust in American Life," a sharp and intelligent inquiry into how the Holocaust has come to be, as Novick says, "our central symbol of atrocity." Novick, a University of Chicago professor who was one of the founders of its program in Jewish studies, does his best to undermine the premise upon which Holocaust obsession and its spawn, guilt, are built. The obsession is recent. After the war, Novick says, Jews shunned identification as victims, and there was almost no public reference to the killing of the Jews. It is only lately, when "the status of victim has come to be prized," that states mandate that the Holocaust be taught in schools, for example. For the survivors themselves, the change can be startling. Forty years ago, Novick observes, they were told that to speak of the Holocaust was bad for them; now it's good. "In both cases, others knew what was best," Novick writes. Public discourse on the subject today is full of contradictions and illogic and, on the part of many Jewish leaders and gentile politicians, self-serving distortions of history, Novick says. These are in no sense justified, he argues, to counter the "tiny band of cranks, kooks and misfits" who deny that the Holocaust occurred, whose influence Novick deems negligible. He objects to the strident insistence (which never permits demur) by many, notably Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel, that the Holocaust was both utterly unique in the annals of human depravity and of universal significance. How can it be both? Novick asks. Why should non-Jewish Americans mourn Hitler's Jewish victims more than Pol Pot's Cambodian ones? Why is there a Holocaust Museum on the Mall in Washington but no comparable memorial for American slavery? [click here to continue]