AmNote on The Savings and Loan Scandal: Jews Screw America It is important to understand how successful societies work in order to understand why Jews are so disruptive to them. On the surface self-interest and self-serving appear to be similar. However, this appearance of similarity is mislead, and self-interest and self-serving are very much different. All successful societies are based on self-interest in which its people have a stake in the success of others. Whereas, self-serving elements in societies destroy the structure of the society.
For example, American’s Founding Fathers envisioned the electoral college to create stability in our society. For example, the Hispanic population in the U.S. is about five percent of the population. In a national election, where the popular vote count is used to elect a national leader, the Hispanic vote wouldn’t take on much meaning and may be ignored completely. However, since the Hispanic vote is concentrated in mainly the southwestern states, such as California where about fifteen percent of the voters are Hispanic, it is important to pursue the Hispanic voters to gain California’s electoral votes. And so the Founding Fathers created a system in which a minority in the population wouldn't be disenfranchised. They would have a voice and a stake in society. Other examples would include less populated states and even regions of the U.S. Would the Founding Fathers have benefited more from having the popular vote instead of from the electoral college determining the leaders of America? Yes. They held the power and land, but it was in their own self-interest to have a stable society to live in rather than them holding all the power. And so the Founding Fathers built inefficiency into the system in order to maintain a stable society, instead of one in which the disenfranchised segments of society are constantly trying to gain power by violence. In such a way, the entire society benefits as a whole.
The self-serving elements in a society do not have a stake in the society or its people. The Jews advocate the separation of Jews from non-Jews and disruptive, self-serving behavior. The Jew sees himself as separate and not a part of the society with no stake in it, and so he doesn't care about his neighbor's success, only his own. Therefore, the Jew is interested in his own success and not the benefit of his success to the society as a whole. The Savings and Loan scandal is evidence of the disruptive nature of the Jew, and what happens when the Jew is allowed to pursue self-serving behavior unchecked. The collusion between the Jewish media, the Jewish moneymen, and Judas politicians in Washington D.C. was obvious during the Saving and Loan Scandals in which Charles Keating was thrown to the wolves by the Jewish media, while the corrupt Jews were kept clean by making the other S&L cases involving Jews non-event stories. If there was ever evidence of a Jewish conspiracy, the S&L scandal exemplifies it. The S&L scandal also serves as an example of how the Jewish controlled U.S. media sanitizes unfavorable and illicit news about Jews. It should be noted that the vast majority of the S&L cases that weren't prosecuted involved Jews as principals. The public-funded Federal Insurance Fund bailed out the S & L institutions, and in the process the Jews walked away with the cash of hard working Americans, instead of being put in jail. Where is the justice? It is just an example of how the little guy always gets it in the neck for the Jew.
Why does the U.S. government allow Jews to do whatever they want, no matter how it hurt the very fabric of the American society. This outright criminal behavior proves that Jews have no respect for the laws of the United States and the American people. Though Jews comprise only 2.2 percent of the U.S. population, they are a major part of the criminal element in America, and have a history of criminal activity here. Can our society tolerate the corrupting Jews? No, it cannot if America wish to be a fair, honest and open society. The hallmark of the Jew is a lack of integrity. A Jew sees the world through the eyes of a sneak thief and liar. To the Jew deception and betrayal are the way things work in the world. It is the nature of the beast to be arrogant and self-serving. It is who the Jew is; it is what the Jew does. The Jew has abused the very state of stability that our Founding Fathers created in which all American can live in peace and prosper. Instead the Jews has created instability in America by pursuing their own greedy, self-serving desires. To understand the difference between a self-interest and a self-serving gives an insight into the corrupting, greedy, and devious nature of the Jew, and why Jews cannot be trusted. The moment you think one Jew is different from another, or that a Jew has your best interest at heart, you make yourself, your family, and your children a victim of a Jew's lies and deceit. And if you don't think so, just turn you back on one!
 Perspective On Scandal; Why The S & L Gang Isn't In Jail —Los Angeles Times
Charles Keating, convicted of criminal fraud in California and facing a 77-count federal indictment, must surely feel like the sacrificial goat in the savings and loan scandal. After all, there have been few other criminal indictments and convictions in this fiasco, and even they attracted little national attention. For a $200-billion cash drain, the crisis has been a real non-event in American criminal justice. But the facts of the Keating case may help us understand why the role of criminal law has been so modest in this, the most expensive white-collar crime wave in history. If it is true that Keating committed major frauds in managing Lincoln Savings & Loan, he was by no means alone in this respect. Whatever the explanation for the small criminal docket in the S&L scandal, it can't be a shortage of potential cases. Every lie told to regulators is a federal felony, and each untruth uttered to obtain a loan from a federally chartered financial institution qualifies its teller for the federal penitentiary. Many of the people who offered the notorious "cash for trash" deals meet the inclusive criteria of the federal criminal code, as do many of the citizens who took the loans. Yet only a fraction of our potential S&L felons are on their way to jail, and there is little pressure to greatly expand prosecution. The reason is hardly an unsolved mystery: It is deposit insurance. [click here to continue]
S & L Hell: The People And The Politics Behind The $1 Trillion Savings And Loan Scandal —Los Angeles Times
Much has been written about the savings-and-loan crooks and their expensive habits. "S&L Hell" is about the aiders and the abettors. The finger points in familiar directions -- Congress and the Keating Five, etc. -- but also in a few surprising ones. Did you know that Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan was once a paid shill for Charles Keating? Kathleen Day, formerly a reporter for this newspaper and for the Washington Post, has produced a detailed and galling analysis of how government, in concert with private enterprise, created the greatest plundering opportunity in the history of peacetime America. If you're still wondering how all this could have happened, here's the short answer: Stage One, early 1980s: High interest rates are ruining the S&L business. The S&L lobby, a.k.a. the League, turns to Washington for help. President Carter, the original dupe in the story, responds with the first of several deregulation bills. This allows the struggling S&Ls to improve their fortunes by investing in other things besides the boring residential mortgages with which they've been stuck to date. Racetracks, industrial parks, brothels in Nevada -- none of these are off-limits. Along with deregulation, Congress then raises the federal deposit insurance to $100,000 for every CD and every individual savings account. The $100,000 figure is never debated openly on the floor of the Senate or the House. It magically appears in the final compromise version of a banking bill -- put there, Day contends, by Sens. Alan Cranston and Jake Garn, plus Rep.Fernan St. Germaine, at the behest of the League. This increase in federal protection results in billions in new deposits flowing into hundreds of S&Ls from coast to coast. These enormous sums can then easily be squandered on the aforementioned deregulated investments. Individuals who might haveconsidered robbing a bank the old-fashioned way now opt for buying an S&L and doling out the proceeds to themselves and their friends. [click here to continue]
Alan Friedman Reviews Murky Tales Of Fiscal Irresponsibility —Financial Times (London)
These are the two newest and most up-to-date books to be written about the US savings and loans scandal, which at last count is expected to cost American taxpayers up to Dollars 500bn in bail-out money and interest over the next 30 years. Both books tell the chilling tale of how Reagan-era deregulation of the thrift industry created a monstrous state of affairs, as traditional home mortgage lenders were allowed to go on an orgy of speculative investment. Both books also document the laxity - and at times, complicity - of Reagan and Bush Administration regulators. The volumes also paint a depressing portrait of corruption in Congress, where numerous lawmakers received campaign contributions from a variety of S&L swindlers and then proceeded to plead their cases and obtain special treatment. The S&L scandal is finally beginning to get the investigative attention it deserves, after years of sloth on the part of most of the American press. But, as Mr Martin Mayer, a seasoned business author, writes inhe Greatest-Ever Bank Robbery: 'The S&L crisis became a scandal . . . mostly because nobody wanted to hear about it - not regulators, academics, Congressmen, or the White House, not accountants, lawyers, newspaper and magazine editors, or TV producers . . . and not the American public.' [click here to continue]
'Tough Jews' - Underworld Predating The Mafia —The Baltimore Sun
Contrary to Hollywood and popular fiction, hoods with names that ended in vowels didn't begin to dominate the newspapers till the late 1920s. Before then, from about World War I almost till the end of Prohibition, many if not most of the most capable and creative gangsters in America - Monk Eastman, Arnod Rothstein, Moe Dalitz, Waxey Gordon, King Solomon, Meyer Lansky, Doc Stacher, Lepke Buchhalter, Jacob Shapiro, Bo Weinberg, Arthur Flegenheimer (a.k.a. Dutch Schultz), Ben "Bugsy" Siegel, Mickey Cohen - were Jewish. [click here to continue]
Small States Will Never Let Electoral College Slip Away —Chicago Sun-Times
Once they're finished laughing up their sleeves about the U.S. presidential election, the locals ask two serious questions. The answers are no, the Electoral College will not be abolished, and no, there will not be a strain toward bipartisan national unity once the election is settled. To eliminate the Electoral College and install majority rule for a presidential election would require a constitutional amendment. That is not going to happen because the senators from the small states will not vote for such a change and because the legislators in the small states will never willingly destroy their own power. Who would lose clout with a majority-rule amendment? Small states, farmers, loggers, ranchers and concentrated minorities like Cubans in Florida and Jews in New York. The Electoral College and the Senate are remnants of the Constitution's desire to balance off the power of the big states, Rhode Island against New York in those days. If the Constitution were amended to eliminate the Electoral College, presidential candidates would not have to travel around the country scrounging for electoral votes in such places as Idaho, Utah and Arizona (where only 36 percent of the registered voters cast ballots). There would be no more desperate attempts to attract the various small minorities. The big urban centers of America would become the battleground -- just what the prairies and the plains and the states of the Old Confederacy don't want. No chance for a constitutional amendment. [click here to continue]
 |
